Product Details
Product Description
The Allen Bradley SST-PB3-CLX-RLL Profibus communication module provides seamless integration of ControlLogix systems with Profibus networks. Supporting DPV0 slave functionality, it enables reliable communication with up to 125 Profibus devices. With flexible transmission speeds, robust backplane current handling, and a compact single-slot design, this module is ideal for distributed automation environments requiring Profibus connectivity.
Technical Specifications
-
Manufacturer Allen Bradley
-
Product Line ControlLogix / Profibus
-
Product Type Profibus Communication Module
-
Part Number SST-PB3-CLX-RLL
-
Weight 430 g
-
Module Location Any slot in ControlLogix chassis
-
Slot Width Single slot
-
Backplane Current 850 mA @ 5 V DC; 1.75 mA @ 24 V DC
-
Supported DP Slaves Up to 125 devices
-
Supported I/O Modules Up to 256
-
Input Data Capacity 122 words
-
Transmission Speeds 9600, 19200, 31.25k, 45.45k, 93.75k, 187.5k, 500k, 1.5M, 3M, 6M, 12M baud
-
Embedded Ports 1 × 9-pin Sub-D connector
-
Network Connection Type PROFIBUS D-Sub female (9 pin)
-
Channel / Port 1 channel, 1 port
-
Protocol Support PROFIBUS DPV0 slave
-
Compatible Series 1756 ControlLogix, Honeywell PlantScape
Application Scenarios
-
Integration of ControlLogix controllers with Profibus-based field devices
-
Distributed automation systems requiring high-speed Profibus communication
-
Industrial environments with large-scale Profibus networks (up to 125 slaves)
FAQ
Q: How many Profibus devices can the SST-PB3-CLX-RLL support? A: Up to 125 DP slaves.
Q: What transmission speeds are available? A: It supports baud rates from 9600 up to 12 Mbps.
Q: Is this module compatible with Honeywell systems? A: Yes, it is compatible with Honeywell PlantScape in addition to ControlLogix.
Comparable Models
-
SST-PB3-CLX-RLL: Profibus DPV0 slave communication module (this model)
-
1756-DNB: DeviceNet communication module for ControlLogix
-
1756-ENBT: Ethernet/IP communication module for ControlLogix
Additional Information
- 100% Genuine Parts: All products are original and authentic, ensuring reliable industrial performance.
- 30-Day Refund Guarantee: Return any in-stock item within 30 days in original, unopened packaging for a full refund (excluding shipping and fees).
- 12-Month Warranty: Covers defects in materials or workmanship; excludes misuse, normal wear, or unauthorized modifications.
- Worldwide Shipping: We ship via USPS, UPS, FedEx, and DHL. Delivery times vary by country and may be subject to customs or import fees.
- Support & Contact: Technical and warranty assistance is available anytime. Contact us here: Contact.
- Purchase Guidance: Check product specifications and compatibility carefully before ordering to ensure proper application.
Tech & Buying Guide
Implementing FIFO and LIFO Data Sequencing in PLC Programming
Data management serves as a cornerstone of modern industrial automation. Whether tracking materials on a conveyor or managing batch sequences in a process, engineers frequently rely on sequential logic. Two primary structures—First-In-First-Out (FIFO) and Last-In-First-Out (LIFO)—form the bedrock of this data handling. Mastering these blocks allows programmers to optimize complex machine operations efficiently.
Evolving SCADA System Architectures in Industrial Automation
A robust Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system serves as the heartbeat of modern industrial operations. Understanding SCADA system architecture is vital for engineers designing efficient control systems. These architectures have evolved from isolated, monolithic structures to highly interconnected, networked ecosystems. Choosing the right design requires balancing data visibility, processing power, and long-term scalability requirements.
Choosing the Right Controller: PLC vs. Motion Controller in Industrial Automation
Selecting the optimal control architecture is a foundational decision in industrial automation. Engineers must frequently choose between a Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) and a dedicated Motion Controller. While both systems manage machinery, their underlying design philosophies differ significantly, impacting performance, scalability, and system integration.