Product Details
Product Description
The PLX31-EIP-MBTCP gateway module from ProSoft Technology provides bi-directional communication between EtherNet/IP and Modbus TCP/IP networks. Designed for seamless integration, it enables efficient data transfer between Rockwell Automation controllers and Modbus TCP/IP devices, supporting industrial automation systems with robust reliability.
Key Specifications
-
Manufacturer: Allen Bradley / ProSoft Technology
-
Series: PLX3 Gateways
-
Model: PLX31-EIP-MBTCP
-
Part Number: PLX31-EIP-MBTCP
-
Product Type: Gateway Module
-
Nominal Voltage: 24 VDC (operates from 10–36 VDC)
-
Data Handling: Up to 10,000 × 16-bit registers
-
Ethernet Protocols: EtherNet/IP and Modbus TCP/IP
-
SD Card Support: Configuration storage and disaster recovery
-
Operating Temperature: –25°C to 70°C (–13°F to 158°F)
-
Storage Temperature: –40°C to 80°C (–40°F to 176°F)
-
Relative Humidity: 5–95% non-condensing
-
Vibration Resistance: 5 g, 10–150 Hz
-
Dimensions: 5.38 × 1.99 × 4.38 in (approx.)
-
Environmental Protection: Optional conformal coating for harsh environments
Core Features
-
Bi-directional gateway between EtherNet/IP and Modbus TCP/IP networks
-
Large register capacity for complex data mapping
-
SD card slot for configuration backup and recovery
-
Compact design suitable for industrial environments
-
Enhanced durability with vibration resistance and conformal coating option
Application Scenarios
-
Integration of Modbus TCP/IP devices into EtherNet/IP-based systems
-
SCADA and distributed control systems requiring protocol conversion
-
Industrial automation environments needing reliable cross-network communication
FAQ
-
Q: How many registers can the PLX31-EIP-MBTCP handle? A: It supports up to 10,000 × 16-bit registers.
-
Q: Does the module include disaster recovery support? A: Yes, configuration files can be stored on an SD card for recovery.
-
Q: What environmental protections are available? A: The module can be supplied with conformal coating for harsh conditions.
Additional Information
- 100% Genuine Parts: All products are original and authentic, ensuring reliable industrial performance.
- 30-Day Refund Guarantee: Return any in-stock item within 30 days in original, unopened packaging for a full refund (excluding shipping and fees).
- 12-Month Warranty: Covers defects in materials or workmanship; excludes misuse, normal wear, or unauthorized modifications.
- Worldwide Shipping: We ship via USPS, UPS, FedEx, and DHL. Delivery times vary by country and may be subject to customs or import fees.
- Support & Contact: Technical and warranty assistance is available anytime. Contact us here: Contact.
- Purchase Guidance: Check product specifications and compatibility carefully before ordering to ensure proper application.
Tech & Buying Guide
Implementing FIFO and LIFO Data Sequencing in PLC Programming
Data management serves as a cornerstone of modern industrial automation. Whether tracking materials on a conveyor or managing batch sequences in a process, engineers frequently rely on sequential logic. Two primary structures—First-In-First-Out (FIFO) and Last-In-First-Out (LIFO)—form the bedrock of this data handling. Mastering these blocks allows programmers to optimize complex machine operations efficiently.
Evolving SCADA System Architectures in Industrial Automation
A robust Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system serves as the heartbeat of modern industrial operations. Understanding SCADA system architecture is vital for engineers designing efficient control systems. These architectures have evolved from isolated, monolithic structures to highly interconnected, networked ecosystems. Choosing the right design requires balancing data visibility, processing power, and long-term scalability requirements.
Choosing the Right Controller: PLC vs. Motion Controller in Industrial Automation
Selecting the optimal control architecture is a foundational decision in industrial automation. Engineers must frequently choose between a Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) and a dedicated Motion Controller. While both systems manage machinery, their underlying design philosophies differ significantly, impacting performance, scalability, and system integration.