Product Details
Product Description
The CP461-11 by Yokogawa is a high-performance processor module designed for advanced industrial automation applications. Built with a powerful digital signal processing (DSP) architecture, it delivers exceptional computational speed and efficiency for control, monitoring, and real-time data processing in distributed control systems (DCS).
Key Features
-
High-Speed DSP Processor: Utilizes a Texas Instruments TMS320F2812 DSP core optimized for control-oriented tasks.
-
Clock Speed: Operates at 400 MHz for fast execution and reliable control response.
-
Memory Configuration:
-
128 KB on-chip SRAM for rapid data access
-
1 MB external SRAM for extended memory capacity
-
Input/Output Interfaces:
-
Two serial communication ports
-
One parallel interface for external connectivity
-
Power Efficiency: Low power consumption rated at approximately 100 mW, ensuring minimal thermal output.
-
Package Type: Compact 48-pin LQFP (Low-Profile Quad Flat Package) for space-efficient system integration.
Technical Specifications
-
Model Number: CP461-11
-
Processor Type: Texas Instruments TMS320F2812 DSP
-
Clock Frequency: 400 MHz
-
On-Chip Memory: 128 KB SRAM
-
External Memory: 1 MB SRAM
-
I/O Ports: 2 serial ports, 1 parallel port
-
Power Consumption: 100 mW
-
Physical Format: 48-pin LQFP
-
Manufacturer: Yokogawa
Applications
The CP461-11 processor module is ideal for use in industrial process control, data acquisition systems, and distributed automation environments requiring high-speed data handling and precise performance.
FAQ
Q: What type of systems is the CP461-11 compatible with?
A: The CP461-11 is designed for use in Yokogawa’s CENTUM CS and VP automation platforms.
Q: Does this module support real-time control applications?
A: Yes, its DSP core enables deterministic, real-time performance suitable for complex industrial control systems.
Q: What advantages does the 48-pin LQFP package provide?
A: It allows for compact installation while maintaining excellent thermal management and electrical performance.
Additional Information
- 100% Genuine Parts: All products are original and authentic, ensuring reliable industrial performance.
- 30-Day Refund Guarantee: Return any in-stock item within 30 days in original, unopened packaging for a full refund (excluding shipping and fees).
- 12-Month Warranty: Covers defects in materials or workmanship; excludes misuse, normal wear, or unauthorized modifications.
- Worldwide Shipping: We ship via USPS, UPS, FedEx, and DHL. Delivery times vary by country and may be subject to customs or import fees.
- Support & Contact: Technical and warranty assistance is available anytime. Contact us here: Contact.
- Purchase Guidance: Check product specifications and compatibility carefully before ordering to ensure proper application.
Tech & Buying Guide
Implementing FIFO and LIFO Data Sequencing in PLC Programming
Data management serves as a cornerstone of modern industrial automation. Whether tracking materials on a conveyor or managing batch sequences in a process, engineers frequently rely on sequential logic. Two primary structures—First-In-First-Out (FIFO) and Last-In-First-Out (LIFO)—form the bedrock of this data handling. Mastering these blocks allows programmers to optimize complex machine operations efficiently.
Evolving SCADA System Architectures in Industrial Automation
A robust Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system serves as the heartbeat of modern industrial operations. Understanding SCADA system architecture is vital for engineers designing efficient control systems. These architectures have evolved from isolated, monolithic structures to highly interconnected, networked ecosystems. Choosing the right design requires balancing data visibility, processing power, and long-term scalability requirements.
Choosing the Right Controller: PLC vs. Motion Controller in Industrial Automation
Selecting the optimal control architecture is a foundational decision in industrial automation. Engineers must frequently choose between a Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) and a dedicated Motion Controller. While both systems manage machinery, their underlying design philosophies differ significantly, impacting performance, scalability, and system integration.