Product Details
Product Description
The MVI46-MNET module from ProSoft Technology is a Modbus TCP/IP communication interface designed for Allen Bradley PLC systems. It enables seamless integration between ControlLogix controllers and Modbus TCP/IP devices, supporting multiple client and server connections with robust memory mapping and diagnostic features.
Key Specifications
-
Manufacturer: Allen Bradley / ProSoft Technology
-
Model: MVI46-MNET
-
Part Number: MVI46-MNET
-
Product Type: Modbus TCP/IP Interface Module
-
Category: PLCs
-
Product Line: ControlLogix
-
Weight: 3.00 lbs (1.36 kg)
-
Protocol: Modbus TCP/IP
-
Connections: 5 MBAP / 5 MNET supported
-
Port: 1 × RJ45 Ethernet
-
Memory Mapping: 5000 × 16-bit registers
-
Backplane Current Load: 800 mA @ 5 VDC, 3 mA @ 24 VDC
-
LED Indicators: Yes (status and diagnostics)
-
Operating Temperature: 0–40°C (32–104°F)
Core Features
-
Provides Modbus TCP/IP connectivity for ControlLogix systems
-
Supports multiple simultaneous client and server connections
-
Large register capacity for complex data mapping
-
Compact single-slot design for easy installation
-
Integrated LED indicators for diagnostics and monitoring
Application Scenarios
-
Integration of Modbus TCP/IP devices into ControlLogix PLC systems
-
SCADA and distributed control systems requiring Modbus communication
-
Industrial automation setups needing reliable Ethernet-based connectivity
FAQ
-
Q: How many connections does the MVI46-MNET support? A: It supports up to 5 MBAP and 5 MNET connections simultaneously.
-
Q: What is the maximum register capacity? A: The module supports up to 5000 × 16-bit registers.
-
Q: Does the module provide diagnostic indicators? A: Yes, LED indicators are included for module and communication status.
Comparison with Similar Modules
-
MVI69-MNET: Modbus TCP/IP module for CompactLogix systems.
-
MVI56E-MNETCR: Enhanced multi-client Modbus TCP/IP module for ControlLogix systems.
-
PLX32-EIP-MBTCP: Gateway module for EtherNet/IP to Modbus TCP/IP communication.
Additional Information
- 100% Genuine Parts: All products are original and authentic, ensuring reliable industrial performance.
- 30-Day Refund Guarantee: Return any in-stock item within 30 days in original, unopened packaging for a full refund (excluding shipping and fees).
- 12-Month Warranty: Covers defects in materials or workmanship; excludes misuse, normal wear, or unauthorized modifications.
- Worldwide Shipping: We ship via USPS, UPS, FedEx, and DHL. Delivery times vary by country and may be subject to customs or import fees.
- Support & Contact: Technical and warranty assistance is available anytime. Contact us here: Contact.
- Purchase Guidance: Check product specifications and compatibility carefully before ordering to ensure proper application.
Tech & Buying Guide
Implementing FIFO and LIFO Data Sequencing in PLC Programming
Data management serves as a cornerstone of modern industrial automation. Whether tracking materials on a conveyor or managing batch sequences in a process, engineers frequently rely on sequential logic. Two primary structures—First-In-First-Out (FIFO) and Last-In-First-Out (LIFO)—form the bedrock of this data handling. Mastering these blocks allows programmers to optimize complex machine operations efficiently.
Evolving SCADA System Architectures in Industrial Automation
A robust Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system serves as the heartbeat of modern industrial operations. Understanding SCADA system architecture is vital for engineers designing efficient control systems. These architectures have evolved from isolated, monolithic structures to highly interconnected, networked ecosystems. Choosing the right design requires balancing data visibility, processing power, and long-term scalability requirements.
Choosing the Right Controller: PLC vs. Motion Controller in Industrial Automation
Selecting the optimal control architecture is a foundational decision in industrial automation. Engineers must frequently choose between a Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) and a dedicated Motion Controller. While both systems manage machinery, their underlying design philosophies differ significantly, impacting performance, scalability, and system integration.