Product Details
Product Description
The GE Fanuc VersaMax IC200PBI001 Profibus Network Interface Module provides seamless integration of VersaMax systems into Profibus networks. Designed for efficient communication, it supports multiple I/O modules and a wide range of network addresses, ensuring reliable data exchange in industrial automation environments.
Technical Specifications
-
Model / Part Number IC200PBI001
-
Manufacturer GE Fanuc Emerson
-
Product Line VersaMax
-
Product Type Profibus Network Interface Module
-
Weight 0.31 lbs (0.14 kg)
-
Current Consumption 250 mA
-
Supported I/O Modules Up to 64 modules
-
Network Address Range 1–125
-
Network Data Rate 9.6 Kbps to 12 Mbps
-
User Diagnostics Data 5 bytes
-
Connector Type 9-pin D-sub
Application Scenarios
-
Integration of VersaMax PLCs into Profibus-based automation networks
-
Multi-module communication setups requiring stable and scalable connectivity
-
Industrial systems needing compact and efficient Profibus interface solutions
FAQ
Q: How many I/O modules can the IC200PBI001 support? A: It supports up to 64 I/O modules.
Q: What is the available network address range? A: The module allows configuration from address 1 to 125.
Q: What connector type is used? A: A 9-pin D-sub connector is provided for Profibus communication.
Q: What data rates are supported? A: The module supports speeds from 9.6 Kbps up to 12 Mbps.
Comparison with Similar Models
-
IC200PBI001: Profibus interface, 64 I/O modules, 9-pin D-sub connector
-
IC200DBI001-DA: DeviceNet interface, supports 64 nodes and 8 modules
-
IC200CMM020: Serial communications module with RS-232 and RS-485 ports
Additional Information
- 100% Genuine Parts: All products are original and authentic, ensuring reliable industrial performance.
- 30-Day Refund Guarantee: Return any in-stock item within 30 days in original, unopened packaging for a full refund (excluding shipping and fees).
- 12-Month Warranty: Covers defects in materials or workmanship; excludes misuse, normal wear, or unauthorized modifications.
- Worldwide Shipping: We ship via USPS, UPS, FedEx, and DHL. Delivery times vary by country and may be subject to customs or import fees.
- Support & Contact: Technical and warranty assistance is available anytime. Contact us here: Contact.
- Purchase Guidance: Check product specifications and compatibility carefully before ordering to ensure proper application.
Tech & Buying Guide
Wellhead Control Panel (WHCP) Architecture in Oil and Gas Automation
Upstream oil and gas operations rely on specialized field control platforms to manage wellhead extraction safety and hydraulic actuation. A Wellhead Control Panel (WHCP) serves as a dedicated hydraulic and pneumatic power unit designed to operate critical Christmas Tree isolation valves. By interfacing field safety components directly with Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) architecture, a WHCP protects upstream extraction assets against overpressure, catastrophic leaks, and thermal emergencies.
Understanding Marshalling Cabinets in Industrial Control Systems Architecture
Industrial control system deployments rely on structured signal distribution to bridge field instrumentation with central processing hardware. A marshalling cabinet serves as the vital intermediate connection point between heavy field home-run multi-pair cables and delicate input/output (I/O) modules housed inside Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) or Distributed Control System (DCS) enclosures. By segregating field cable terminations from control hardware, engineers maintain system flexibility, safeguard controller components, and streamline commissioning workflows.
FAT vs SAT in Industrial Control Systems: Key Differences and Execution Guide
Industrial control system deployment relies on strict verification protocols to guarantee operational safety, system stability, and regulatory compliance. Commissioning complex Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) racks, Distributed Control Systems (DCS), and Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS) requires two critical milestones: the Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) and the Site Acceptance Test (SAT). Both procedures validate that system automation meets design specifications, but they occur at different stages of project execution and target distinct operational risks.