Product Details
Overview
The GE Fanuc IC697CMM742 is an Ethernet interface module engineered for Series 90-70 PLC systems. It provides robust network connectivity with multiple ports and diagnostic LEDs, allowing reliable integration of PLCs into industrial Ethernet networks. This single-slot module supports high-speed communication, system monitoring, and easy maintenance, making it suitable for critical automation applications.
Technical Specifications
-
Manufacturer GE Fanuc (Emerson Automation)
-
Series Series 90-70
-
Part Number IC697CMM742
-
Product Type Ethernet Interface Module
-
Module Weight 1.19 lbs (0.54 kg)
-
Slot Requirement 1-slot in the PLC CPU rack
-
Network Ports 3 total
-
10BaseT Port: Ethernet, IEEE 802.3 CSMA/CD
-
10Base2 Port: Ethernet, IEEE 802.3 CSMA/CD
-
AUI Port: Ethernet, IEEE 802.3 CSMA/CD
-
LED Indicators 4 LEDs: MODULE OK, LAN ONLINE, SERIAL ACTIVE, STATUS
-
Operating Voltage +5 VDC, +12 VDC
-
Current Draw +5 VDC: 2.0 A typical; +12 VDC: 0.5 A maximum (with external AUI transceiver)
-
Internal Fuse 5 x 20 mm, 250V, 1.0A slow-acting
-
Restart Method Pushbutton
Key Features
-
Provides multiple Ethernet ports for flexible network connectivity
-
Single-slot design compatible with Series 90-70 PLC racks
-
LEDs for monitoring module health and network activity
-
Pushbutton restart simplifies troubleshooting and maintenance
-
Supports connection to MS-DOS-based diagnostic tools
Application Scenarios
-
PLC integration into Ethernet-based industrial networks
-
Networked control systems with remote monitoring
-
High-availability communication setups in Series 90-70 PLCs
-
Diagnostics and maintenance of multi-rack PLC networks
FAQs
Q: How many Ethernet ports does the IC697CMM742 provide?
A: It provides three ports: 10BaseT, 10Base2, and an AUI port.
Q: Can it be installed in any PLC rack slot?
A: It requires a single-slot CPU rack location for installation.
Q: How is the module restarted?
A: A pushbutton on the module allows for manual restart without removing the unit.
Additional Information
- 100% Genuine Parts: All products are original and authentic, ensuring reliable industrial performance.
- 30-Day Refund Guarantee: Return any in-stock item within 30 days in original, unopened packaging for a full refund (excluding shipping and fees).
- 12-Month Warranty: Covers defects in materials or workmanship; excludes misuse, normal wear, or unauthorized modifications.
- Worldwide Shipping: We ship via USPS, UPS, FedEx, and DHL. Delivery times vary by country and may be subject to customs or import fees.
- Support & Contact: Technical and warranty assistance is available anytime. Contact us here: Contact.
- Purchase Guidance: Check product specifications and compatibility carefully before ordering to ensure proper application.
Tech & Buying Guide
Implementing FIFO and LIFO Data Sequencing in PLC Programming
Data management serves as a cornerstone of modern industrial automation. Whether tracking materials on a conveyor or managing batch sequences in a process, engineers frequently rely on sequential logic. Two primary structures—First-In-First-Out (FIFO) and Last-In-First-Out (LIFO)—form the bedrock of this data handling. Mastering these blocks allows programmers to optimize complex machine operations efficiently.
Evolving SCADA System Architectures in Industrial Automation
A robust Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system serves as the heartbeat of modern industrial operations. Understanding SCADA system architecture is vital for engineers designing efficient control systems. These architectures have evolved from isolated, monolithic structures to highly interconnected, networked ecosystems. Choosing the right design requires balancing data visibility, processing power, and long-term scalability requirements.
Choosing the Right Controller: PLC vs. Motion Controller in Industrial Automation
Selecting the optimal control architecture is a foundational decision in industrial automation. Engineers must frequently choose between a Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) and a dedicated Motion Controller. While both systems manage machinery, their underlying design philosophies differ significantly, impacting performance, scalability, and system integration.