Product Details
Product Overview
The Allen-Bradley 22-COMM-E is a compact EtherNet/IP adapter designed to integrate seamlessly with PowerFlex 4, 40, and 400 drives. This module enables high-speed industrial Ethernet communication, providing robust network connectivity for distributed control systems. Equipped with a single RJ45 port, it supports multiple TCP connections and high packet rates to ensure efficient data transfer. Its lightweight design and wide operating temperature range make it suitable for diverse industrial environments.
Technical Specifications
-
Manufacturer: Allen-Bradley (Rockwell Automation)
-
Model Number: 22-COMM-E
-
Product Type: EtherNet/IP Adapter
-
Product Line: PowerFlex 40
-
Compatible Drives: PowerFlex 4, 40, 400
-
Communication Port: 1 × RJ45
-
Communication Protocol: EtherNet/IP
-
Data Rates Supported: 10/100 Mbps Full Duplex and Half Duplex
-
Number of TCP Connections: Up to 30
-
RPI: 5 ms minimum
-
Packet Rate: 400 total I/O packets per second (200 in / 200 out)
-
Drive Power Consumption: 350 mA at 5V DC (supplied by host drive or DPI kit)
-
Operating Temperature: -10 to 50 °C (14 to 122 °F)
-
Storage Temperature: -40 to 85 °C (-40 to 185 °F)
-
Relative Humidity: 5–95% non-condensing
-
Status Indicators: 4 LEDs
-
DSI Connector: 20 pins
-
Cabling: RJ-45 CAT compliant cable
-
Weight: 0.13 lbs (0.06 kg)
Application Scenarios
-
Enabling high-speed Ethernet communication for PowerFlex drives
-
Connecting multiple drives within a single EtherNet/IP network
-
Suitable for factory automation, process control, and distributed control systems
-
Ideal for upgrading legacy systems to industrial Ethernet without replacing drives
FAQ
Q: Which PowerFlex drives are compatible with the 22-COMM-E?
A: PowerFlex 4, 40, and 400 series drives.
Q: What is the maximum packet rate supported?
A: Up to 400 I/O packets per second (200 in / 200 out).
Q: Can it operate in harsh environments?
A: Yes, it supports -10 to 50 °C operating temperature and 5–95% non-condensing humidity.
Additional Information
- 100% Genuine Parts: All products are original and authentic, ensuring reliable industrial performance.
- 30-Day Refund Guarantee: Return any in-stock item within 30 days in original, unopened packaging for a full refund (excluding shipping and fees).
- 12-Month Warranty: Covers defects in materials or workmanship; excludes misuse, normal wear, or unauthorized modifications.
- Worldwide Shipping: We ship via USPS, UPS, FedEx, and DHL. Delivery times vary by country and may be subject to customs or import fees.
- Support & Contact: Technical and warranty assistance is available anytime. Contact us here: Contact.
- Purchase Guidance: Check product specifications and compatibility carefully before ordering to ensure proper application.
Tech & Buying Guide
Implementing FIFO and LIFO Data Sequencing in PLC Programming
Data management serves as a cornerstone of modern industrial automation. Whether tracking materials on a conveyor or managing batch sequences in a process, engineers frequently rely on sequential logic. Two primary structures—First-In-First-Out (FIFO) and Last-In-First-Out (LIFO)—form the bedrock of this data handling. Mastering these blocks allows programmers to optimize complex machine operations efficiently.
Evolving SCADA System Architectures in Industrial Automation
A robust Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system serves as the heartbeat of modern industrial operations. Understanding SCADA system architecture is vital for engineers designing efficient control systems. These architectures have evolved from isolated, monolithic structures to highly interconnected, networked ecosystems. Choosing the right design requires balancing data visibility, processing power, and long-term scalability requirements.
Choosing the Right Controller: PLC vs. Motion Controller in Industrial Automation
Selecting the optimal control architecture is a foundational decision in industrial automation. Engineers must frequently choose between a Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) and a dedicated Motion Controller. While both systems manage machinery, their underlying design philosophies differ significantly, impacting performance, scalability, and system integration.