Product Details
Overview
The 80026-230-01-R dual coil contactor/starter coil from Allen-Bradley is engineered for high-current switching applications. Part of the PowerFlex line, this coil assembly supports continuous operation and is optimized for robust performance in motor control and power distribution systems. The dual-coil design provides flexibility in control circuits, while the copper windings and Class B insulation ensure reliable electrical performance under demanding conditions.
Technical Specifications
-
Model / Part Number: 80026-230-01-R
-
Manufacturer: Allen-Bradley
-
Product Line: PowerFlex
-
Product Type: Contactor/Starter Coil
-
Weight: 2.88 lbs (1.30 kg)
-
Coil Type: Single Coil, dual configuration
-
Number of Coils: 2
-
Insulation Class: Class B
-
Output Current Rating: 400 A
-
Voltage Rating: 230 V
-
Duty Cycle: Continuous
-
Enclosure Type: Open Style
-
Frequency: 50/60 Hz
-
Terminal Type: Screw/Lug
-
Mounting Style: Internal / Frame Mount
-
Coil Material: Copper windings for high conductivity and heat tolerance
Application Scenarios
The 80026-230-01-R is ideal for integration into motor control centers, industrial panels, and automation systems requiring high-current switching with precise coil control. Its dual-coil capability allows for advanced control strategies in variable motor load applications or redundancy setups.
FAQ
Q: Can this coil be used with other PowerFlex contactors?
A: Yes, it is compatible with the PowerFlex contactor family that supports dual coil configurations.
Q: What is the maximum current it can handle?
A: The coil is rated for an output current of 400 A continuous.
Q: How is the coil mounted?
A: The unit is designed for internal or frame mounting using screw/lug terminals.
Q: What are the benefits of dual coils?
A: Dual coils enable flexible control circuit design, including alternate activation sequences or redundancy for high-reliability applications.
Q: How does this model compare to earlier single-coil versions?
A: The 80026-230-01-R offers dual-coil control for more complex switching scenarios, while maintaining robust copper windings and Class B insulation for durability.
Additional Information
- 100% Genuine Parts: All products are original and authentic, ensuring reliable industrial performance.
- 30-Day Refund Guarantee: Return any in-stock item within 30 days in original, unopened packaging for a full refund (excluding shipping and fees).
- 12-Month Warranty: Covers defects in materials or workmanship; excludes misuse, normal wear, or unauthorized modifications.
- Worldwide Shipping: We ship via USPS, UPS, FedEx, and DHL. Delivery times vary by country and may be subject to customs or import fees.
- Support & Contact: Technical and warranty assistance is available anytime. Contact us here: Contact.
- Purchase Guidance: Check product specifications and compatibility carefully before ordering to ensure proper application.
Tech & Buying Guide
Implementing FIFO and LIFO Data Sequencing in PLC Programming
Data management serves as a cornerstone of modern industrial automation. Whether tracking materials on a conveyor or managing batch sequences in a process, engineers frequently rely on sequential logic. Two primary structures—First-In-First-Out (FIFO) and Last-In-First-Out (LIFO)—form the bedrock of this data handling. Mastering these blocks allows programmers to optimize complex machine operations efficiently.
Evolving SCADA System Architectures in Industrial Automation
A robust Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system serves as the heartbeat of modern industrial operations. Understanding SCADA system architecture is vital for engineers designing efficient control systems. These architectures have evolved from isolated, monolithic structures to highly interconnected, networked ecosystems. Choosing the right design requires balancing data visibility, processing power, and long-term scalability requirements.
Choosing the Right Controller: PLC vs. Motion Controller in Industrial Automation
Selecting the optimal control architecture is a foundational decision in industrial automation. Engineers must frequently choose between a Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) and a dedicated Motion Controller. While both systems manage machinery, their underlying design philosophies differ significantly, impacting performance, scalability, and system integration.