Product Details
The Honeywell LG1093AA24, also cataloged as the LG1093AA24 Flame Sensor, operates as a dedicated hardware component for direct flame detection and signal monitoring within industrial burner management systems.
Hardware Specifications
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Model | LG1093AA24 |
| Brand | Honeywell |
| Origin | USA / Global Manufacturing |
| Operating Temp | Standard Industrial Flame Sensor Rating |
| Power Consumption | System-powered via burner control interface |
| Cable Length | 16 ft (4.9 m) |
| Core Technology | Optical/Ultraviolet Flame Detection Element |
4-20 mA HART Loop Protocol and Channel-to-Channel Isolation
The LG1093AA24 flame sensing element converts targeted optical radiation emitted by combustion reactions into electrical telemetry for flame safeguard controllers. Sensor signal conditioning pathways interface with burner control modules to ensure immediate flame presence or flameout status verification.
Internal wiring and signal line paths utilize high-density insulation dielectric layers to maintain channel-to-channel isolation and prevent ground loop interference. Integrated noise suppression shields protect signal current transmission from industrial electromagnetic fields across the 16 ft (4.9 m) integral factory-terminated lead wire runs.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What is the factory lead cable length provided with the LG1093AA24 assembly?
A: The sensor includes an integral factory-installed connection cable measuring 16 ft (4.9 m) in length.
Q: How does the LG1093AA24 interface with central burner safeguard systems?
A: The device interfaces directly through dedicated signal wiring, delivering raw or conditioned flame current signals to compatible safety control cards.
Q: Can the sensor wiring lead be spliced or extended in the field?
A: Field splices are not recommended without proper high-temperature shielded junctions, as unshielded extensions introduce signal attenuation and electrical noise.
Field Installation Guidelines
- Mount the sensor assembly securely on the sight pipe, ensuring a direct and unobstructed line of sight to the flame envelope.
- Route the integral 16 ft (4.9 m) cable through dedicated metallic conduit separated from high-voltage ignition transformer leads to prevent inductive coupling.
- Ground all conduit runs and enclosures according to local electrical codes, maintaining shield continuity up to the controller terminals.
- Inspect optical viewing ports regularly for soot accumulation or physical damage to prevent signal degradation.
Additional Information
- 100% Genuine Parts: All products are original and authentic, ensuring reliable industrial performance.
- 30-Day Refund Guarantee: Return any in-stock item within 30 days in original, unopened packaging for a full refund (excluding shipping and fees).
- 12-Month Warranty: Covers defects in materials or workmanship; excludes misuse, normal wear, or unauthorized modifications.
- Worldwide Shipping: We ship via USPS, UPS, FedEx, and DHL. Delivery times vary by country and may be subject to customs or import fees.
- Support & Contact: Technical and warranty assistance is available anytime. Contact us here: Contact.
- Purchase Guidance: Check product specifications and compatibility carefully before ordering to ensure proper application.
Tech & Buying Guide
Transforming Shop Floor Data into Actionable Insights: A Deep Dive into MES
Manufacturing Execution Systems serve as the digital backbone of modern factory floors. Positioned at Level 3 of the ISA-95 automation pyramid, MES links enterprise resource planning with real-time shop floor control systems. Today, industrial operators rely on MES software to bridge operational strategy with physical production execution.
Managed Switch vs. Unmanaged Switch: Industrial Ethernet Architecture
Hot Standby vs. Cold Standby Redundancy in Industrial Automation
System availability determines process safety and productivity in industrial automation. Control engineers deploy redundancy to eliminate single points of failure. This technical guide evaluates Hot Standby vs. Cold Standby architectures, comparing failover speeds, memory sync, cost trade-offs, and field selection criteria.